The colour difference in unprocessed and processed soybean hull powders was visually shown in Fig.
1(b). Table 1 displayed the parameters (L∗, a∗ and b∗) of HunterLab colour in control and treatment.
The L∗ reading is an indicator of brightness of the sample, with values closer to 100 being more bright.
L∗ value in SHB-T was 76.05 ± 0.19, whereas the one in SHB-C was 58.55 ± 0.23, indicating a significant difference in L∗ (p < 0.05). The L∗ value in SHB-C reported here is in accordance with previously studied ( Slavin, Kenworthy, & Yu, 2009), in which L∗ values ranged from 58.3 ± 1.3 to 63.7 ± 0.5 in yellow soybean seed coat. b∗ indicates the yellow to blue, with positive values representing yellow and negative values representing blue.
The SHB-C powders have higher positive b∗ than that of SHB-T.
SHB-T exhibited more red than SHB-C, while SHB-C performed slightly more yellow than SHB-T.
In general, there was significant difference (p < 0.05) in three parameters between SBH-C and SHB-T.
The colour difference in unprocessed and processed soybean hull powders was visually shown in Fig.
1(b). Table 1 displayed the parameters (L∗, a∗ and b∗) of HunterLab colour in control and treatment.
The L∗ reading is an indicator of brightness of the sample, with values closer to 100 being more bright.
L∗ value in SHB-T was 76.05 ± 0.19, whereas the one in SHB-C was 58.55 ± 0.23, indicating a significant difference in L∗ (p < 0.05). The L∗ value in SHB-C reported here is in accordance with previously studied ( Slavin, Kenworthy, & Yu, 2009), in which L∗ values ranged from 58.3 ± 1.3 to 63.7 ± 0.5 in yellow soybean seed coat. b∗ indicates the yellow to blue, with positive values representing yellow and negative values representing blue.
The SHB-C powders have higher positive b∗ than that of SHB-T.
SHB-T exhibited more red than SHB-C, while SHB-C performed slightly more yellow than SHB-T.
In general, there was significant difference (p < 0.05) in three parameters between SBH-C and SHB-T.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
