Dean I like the way you have appora

Dean I like the way you have apporached the topic with some thought in putting together a pro and con list. You make a good argument that when considering the positives and negatives of Nuclear energy the negatives do outnumber the positives. But, my question to you is do the positive effects of Nuclear Energy make it worth while to invest in Nuclear energy as a future energy source?

When I think about the topic, I find myself in favor of Nuclear energy. I think this for a couple of reasons. One, becasue Nuclear energy is much cleaner. It emits less green houses gasses at the same time it creates high amounts of electricity. Going "green" has become ever increasily important. So, it would be wise to invest in a technology that can potentially bring down the green house gas emmisions. Two, with nuclear energy there is low operating costs. This menas that power can be sold to people at a reduced price. This also means that companies that work with the reactors will save money and will be able to apply it to safety. With the extra money they gain from low operating costs, they could potentially make significant improvements on the safety of the Nuclear power plants.

I believe that these two positive affects of Nuclear enrgy already outweigh the negative affects.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

我喜欢你有一些思想探讨的话题放在一起的正反列表的方式。你有一个好的说法，当考虑的肯定和否定核能的负片多于阳性。但是，我想问你的是做核能源的积极的影响，使它值得投资的核能源作为未来能源？

当我想到这个话题，我发现自己在支持核能源。我认为这是有原因的。一，因为核能是清洁得多。它释放更少的绿色房屋气体在它创造了大量的电力，同时。将“绿色”已经变得脆硬的重要。所以，这将是明智的投资在技术，可以降低金边绿屋酒店气体发射。两个，核能源有低运行成本。这种方法，可以以较低的价格卖给人们。这意味着公司工作的反应堆将节省的钱，就可以将它应用到安全。用额外的钱，他们获得从低运营成本，他们可能会对核电站的安全做出重大改进。

我相信这些积极影响核能源已经超过了负面影响。