河原田さんUQ4 台上Ｇｒ・Pmaxの測定ポイントは、3200rpmで

河原田さん
UQ4 台上Ｇｒ

・Pmaxの測定ポイントは、3200rpmで正しいのですか。 最高出力点 3600rpm で測定しない理由を知りたい。
しかも、Pmax目標値に達していないように見えるが、これで良いのか。
少なくとも Pmax波形は記録として残しているべき。大丈夫ですか。 （デジタル数値だけではダメ）
・WOT性能で 4400rpmまで測定する意味があるのか。（目標値の乖離が大き過ぎる。）
・燃料温度はMustでは？
・ラジエタキャップ設定圧； 300ｋＰａ とは、本当？
・試験油（軽油）の性状も提出させるべき。
・モニタラベル
目標系のECMモニタ値（QFIN、PFIN、TFIN、VNT dutyなど） と、結果系のモニタ値（実Q、実ブースト、NPC,など）は、
きちんと記録されていると思っていいですか？

正しく事前評価して、正しく記録を残さなければ、耐久試験の意味無いですよ。

熊澤

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

Measurement point Kawarada of Mr.
Gr

· pmax uq4 on-die, do you correct 3200rpm. I want to know why you do not measure at the highest point output 3600rpm.
In addition, it does not seem to reach the target value pmax, but do you good in this.
Pmax waveform should have left as a record at least. Is it OK? Whether it is meaningful to measure up to 4400rpm in
· wot performance (not always about only digital number).
And fuel temperature (. Deviation of the target value is too large) are in must?
· Radiator cap set pressure; and 300kPa, and true?
-Properties test oil (diesel) also should be submitted.
• The thought (qfin, pfin, tfin, and vnt duty) and ecm monitor value of the monitor label
target system, (real q, the real boost, such as npc,) monitor the value of the result system, have been well documented
sure you want?

The pre-evaluation correctly, If you do not leave the record correctly, It is not the meaning of the endurance test.


Kumazawa

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

Kawarada - UQ at four on the Gr and Pmax 3200 rpm measurement point, right? I want to know why the measured maximum output point, 3600 rpm. Look at the Pmax does not reach the target value, this is good. At least Pmax waveform to be left as a record. Are you all right. The significance of measuring up to and including at WOT 4400 RPM performance only (digital value. The discrepancy between the target value is too large.) The temperature at the fuel Must? AtRadiator cap and the set pressure and the kPa 300? At the test oil (diesel oil) should be submitted to the property. The value of ECM monitor monitor labels at the target system, the QFIN PFIN TFIN VNT duty, etc.), and the results of the monitor system (such as the actual value Q, boost, NPC,), and I think properly recorded? Too right, assessment should be left to right, there is no record of a durability test. Kumazawa too.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

Ms. Kawaharada
UQ4 on Gr

-Pmax measurement point is at 3200 rpm correct?. Want to know why not measured at maximum output point 3600 rpm.
What looks like and the Pmax goals not reached, this is good.
At least waveforms Pmax should have left as a record. Are you ok? （ not only digital numbers ）
, or have the means to measure up to 4400 rpm at WOT performance. （ target value gap is too large. ）
and the fuel temperature Must not?
-Radiator cap set pressure; 300 kPa and, really?
-To submit also the characteristics of the test oil (diesel).
-モニタラベル
(QFIN, PFIN, TFIN, VNT duty etc) ECM monitoring value of goals and results based monitoring value (real Q, real boost, NPC, etc) is
? they are properly recorded?

There is no assessment to properly and correctly leave the record, meaning endurance test.

Kumazawa